Module 4 · Chapter 11
Control: the Board, Consent Matters and Information Rights
A minority investor cannot win a shareholder vote. Its control comes from a board seat, a quorum rule, a list of things the company must ask about, and a monthly flow of numbers.
In this chapter
- Where a minority investor's control really comes from
- How the consent list works, and why it is written twice
- What the investors are sent, and their right to new shares first
11.1Investor control in one paragraph
After the Series A, Meridian held 30% of the shares on the register. That is not enough to pass any resolution on its own. Yet Solaris needed Meridian's agreement for twenty-two kinds of decision, and its board could not act in writing, or at a first meeting, without Meridian's director. That control came from the board, a quorum rule and a list, not from the percentage.
Key point
A fund does not want to run the companies it invests in. It wants to make sure the company cannot surprise it. The founders' worry is the mirror image: a company that must ask permission moves more slowly than one that simply decides.
Also in this chapter
- Why 30% of the shares is a veto, not control
- The board and the quorum veto
- The Investor Director works for the company
- The consent list and who must agree
- Asking for consent, and when silence counts
- Why the list is written twice
- What the investors are sent
- Late reports and the fund's own investors
- Pre-emption: first refusal on new shares
- The one thing the list missed
- Your job
Preview
The rest of this chapter opens with a free account. Every edition is free to read until 31 January. Open a free account by the end of that day and keep every edition published by then, for good. Open it from the edition home →
The rest of this chapter is in the Library, at €12 a month or €79 for a Year Pass. See what the edition holds →